Is privacy for paedos?

It’s been a peculiar day for a national inquiry into the activities of the press and rights to privacy.

Paul McMullan – a caricature so extreme as to be almost unbelievable – shared his excitement at the dark arts he was told to take part in, he says, to please his bosses.

McMullan was brutally honest: “I absolutely loved giving chase to celebrities. Before [Princess] Diana died it was such good fun. How many jobs can you have car chases in? It was great.”

He was bizarre: “”In 21 years of invading people’s privacy I’ve never actually come across anyone who’s been doing any good. Privacy is the space bad people need to do bad things in. Privacy is for paedos. If there is a privacy law your secrets are going to be much more valuable than they were before.”

And he shared an important insight into life at News International: “”Andy Coulson brought that practice [phone hacking] wholesale with him when he was made deputy editor. They should have had the strength of conviction to say, ‘Yes, sometimes you have to stray into black or grey illegal areas’ instead they said we didn’t know they were doing it. They should have been the heroes of journalism. They’re the scum of journalism for trying to drop me and my colleagues in it.”

Much of this was, of course, met with shock and disgust on Twitter. His name started trending and the insults flying from readers and journalists alike. There was also much humour despite McMullan again admitting he fears one of his stories led to the suicide of actor Denholm Elliott’s daughter.

The angry reaction to the tabloid press was similar when defending Hugh Grant and Steve Coogan: a full-on attack on journalism and journalists; an assumption all journalists rifle through bins; calls to curb the power of the press; pity for all those who were “victims” of the nasty practices of British journalists.

You could almost believe that no one read what was printed in the News of the World – despite its circulation being in the millions.

Then I was shown a YouTube clip – watched by millions – of a woman ranting wild, idiotic racism at fellow passengers on a tram.

The video – filmed secretly – was viewed by 3,438,078. The story was reported across most national titles. She was later arrested for a public order offence (Racially Aggravated Section 4a) and remanded on custody: her name, age and where she lives was, of course, revealed in court.

This too started to trend on Twitter. The woman received threats of violence, anonymous death threats, abuse and was vilified and demonised.

She had been secretly filmed being stupid and repulsive on a tram and that stupidity was watched by more than three million people – in much the same way Hugh Grant and Steve Coogan were caught out being chauvinistic with lapdancers and prostitutes by the News of the World and read by many millions.

She has no opportunity to blame the press for her own stupid behaviour and pig-ignorance during a national inquiry broadcast live.

While one can’t remotely defend her outburst one can’t help but wonder where the discussion is about her privacy and – in a world where celebrities get to whine endlessly about media intrusion – if people like her will now become the focus of the gossiping, moralistic, stories of the tabloid press?

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Is privacy for paedos?

  1. I am glad that we both independently thought about the wrongs of this kind of public ‘slappy-mob-jury’ broadcasting … the things that were written about what people would do to her… all the people who wished her little boy taken away from her… I hope this woman has an extended family who will be looking after her, past this publicly humbling experience. She (and her son when he’s older) have both learned a harsh lesson very harshly meeted out during the last 24 hours.

    I found that the intentions of the woman who uploaded this video recording from her mobile onto YouTube to be equally sickening and provoking of racial hatred, this is after reading commenters’ comments posted below the video on YouTube, they were cruel, threatening and sickening in their wishes or their intentions. About time it all got wipped off YouTube and the whole thing reported in a more dignified manner.

    • Stories about it appear on websites for the Guardian, The Sun, The Daily Mail, Metro, Daily Mirror, The Telegraph, Evening Standard, The Independent, the Irish Times, New Zealand Herald, Scottish Daily Record, Irish Independent, Washington Post, New Yorker blog, Metro News Canada … not to mention the many other news sites who showed it and reported on her arrest. It strikes me as ironic that this should be global news in the same week rich celebrities, with much legal advice and opportunity to be heard, complain about attacks on their privacy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s