London 2012 ..?

Rain splashes hard onto the pavement as a woman rushes home from work, her head aching with worry at not being able to make ends meet or, worse still, losing her job and not being entitled to benefits. She fears she will have to leave the capital despite knowing more work is available here.

She knows that the economy – having been through a long period of growth – has slumped and the increasing population – with people moving to the capital from foreign countries and other British cities – means jobs are scarce so many scramble for anything available. She works two jobs and has little to live on, struggling to feed and clothe herself and her children.

She’s not an unusual sight as she walks, her head down against the wind, worry etched in her face. Wages for the few jobs available are low – and shrinking – many are desperate to live near to where work is available but this is almost impossible. So available housing is scarce and increasingly costly, often resulting in overcrowded conditions, particularly for the lowest paid, foreign workers.

‘In big, once handsome houses […] people of all ages may inhabit a single room’,* Meanwhile, landlords make healthy profits from the demand on homes.

She read a speech by an MP and was stunned by his limited understanding of the way she lives.

“Many areas […] are blighted by fractured families, worklessness, educational failure, addictions, serious personal debt, anti-social behaviour and crime. Too many tenants find themselves […] where welfare dependency is a way of life, cut off from the job opportunities, social networks and wealth the rest of us enjoys.”

She knows of young people who have been turned out of home as their families are unable to support them. Living on their wits, stealing and fighting they seem a very real threat in a country where riots are becoming commonplace.

She thinks back to the speech.

“The lack of good male role models in many areas […] makes the next generation of boys susceptible to getting involved in anti-social and criminal behaviour. Family breakdown also makes girls much more vulnerable to early sex and teenage pregnancy, potentially repeating their mother’s life experience.”

She knows of families who desperately try to stay together often moving together – knowing the local council is now responsible to decide upon the amount of money available to the poor in need.

“Social justice can only be achieved in a society in which we each make the contribution we are capable of. Every household should be helped to achieve economic self-sufficiency, even if that can’t always be fully realised.”

Hand-outs are increasingly considered the wrong thing to do for the poor, with philanthropy and charity now seen as ways to help those in genuine need. The government is looking at ways to reduce money intended for the poor, to take beggars off the streets and to encourage poor people to look after themselves. She knows the poor are easy scapegoats, increasingly seen as feckless, lazy or drunks who are unwilling to work.

“Helping workless households move from dependency to independence must be a central objective in tackling poverty and advancing social justice. The back-to-work needs of workless households must be put at the centre of welfare provision.”

She has heard talk of the deserving poor of ‘anyone thrown out of work or into financial straits by events beyond his or her control — elimination of a job, illness or old age, etc’ being accepted in the short-term. And of those seen as ‘made up of that class of people who declined to work, and made a perceived effort to live off the county dole or by conning honest folk, or who were ill or disabled due to their own folly — such as by being a drunkard, or catching a social disease. Such people were not entitled to pity, or really much consideration at all’. ***

She knows that’s how many people see her as she passes by on her way home.

Some of this is from depictions of life in Victorian London and some from London today … I’ll leave you to decide which. The quotes in italics are courtesy of current Work and Pensions Secretary and eager welfare reformer Iain Duncan Smith.


*The Victorian Underworld, Kellow Chesney

***Those That Will Not Work, Henry Mayhew

Victorian Web

Victorian Guide toThose Who Will Not Work

Riots and Disorder


3 thoughts on “London 2012 ..?

  1. If the Government succeed in their aim to socially engineer London by emptying it of it’s Social ‘underclass..’ they will, in one move, create a dystopia of the rest of the Country – while turning London into an ‘economic apartheidt’ capital. Perhaps they will even build a wall around London, requiring Passports and ID Papers to be shown at the border. Should London be struck by some deadly virus, tsunami or other climate-based disaster – should the rest of the Country care? The North of England built the prosperity of the whole nation – for it was the centre of industrial innovation and creativity and the crucible of the heavy steel industries, mining and manufacture. How strange that, even since the number of Northern Oxbridge Graduates has risen decade after decade, the North of England is STILL regarded as the epicentre of stupidity, lack of morality and subeducation? Now the North is seen ‘fit’ to be the dumping ground of those London wants rid of – Councils (mainly Tory) deciding to dispossess those in the Capital and send them into employment oblivion: and, god help them, they probably won’t find a warm welcome here. The last thing the North wants is for more of the same problems of chronic unemployment or unemployability to be transported from the ‘affluent’ South which will inevitably impoverish the North further. I pity those who are about to become London’s “refugees” – victims of London’s narcissism and conceit and their infamous ‘indifference, half the time not knowing and caring even less for their workless neighbour. It will not end well for London: not at all!

    • While I understand your anger I think it important we remember that workers going to London or those being pushed out of the capital are all workers paying the price for a global economic crisis not of their making. One wonders if, as in the Victorian era, many jobseekers will – when possible – choose to move to cities where councils are not savagely cutting access to benefits. In Manchester it has just been agreed that the Labour council will cut “at least 15 per cent in council tax benefit for working age adults, affecting 23 per cent of the city, amounting to £5 million each year”, according to Manchester Mule. This is a council which, according to the Manchester Evening News, its Chief Executive earns “£203,934-a-year, while 1,244 people employed on the council’s lowest wages, take home salaries of £12,489 and £12,787 – 16 times less.” It’s important to always remember, I think, that some of us – the workers – really are in this together.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s